CPUs:
All versions of PROP_DESIGN are designed to run on AMD and Intel x86-64 processors. For other processor types, you will have to re-compile the Fortran 77 source code files.
Operating Systems:
If you want to run PROP_DESIGN on an operating system other than 64-bit Windows, you will have to re-compile the Fortran 77 source code files.
Mobile Computing:
The best option is to use a laptop or tablet running Microsoft Windows. These run 64-bit Windows on a x86-64 processor. Thus, you could run PROP_DESIGN out of the box. This approach is nice, because you could design a propeller for a prospective without having to return to the office. So if you were in a meeting or at a trade show, with a few inputs from the prospective customer, you could generate a design right there.
Apple Products:
I have never used Apple products, due to their business practices. If you want to run PROP_DESIGN on an Apple product, you will have to figure that out on your own.
PROP_DESIGN is used in combination with several other software programs:
All of the CAD models, shown on this website, were created with Rhino. All of the renderings, shown on this website, were created with KeyShot.
The compilation options I use are in the 'c.bat' files. You can tune these for your specific processor and possibly gain a little more speed. This isn't necessary though, as the codes run very fast as is. The 'c.bat' files are for use with Intel Fortran. You can modify them to work with any Fortran compiler, though. If you want to compile the source code files, you can use one of the following programs:
Recently, I used 2D CFD software, to look into airfoil interaction effects. I haven't found any CFD software that can match the NACA 65A009 wind tunnel data. However, most CFD software programs should be able to look at changes in performance. Doing this, I found that a minimum spacing of three times the airfoil chord is appropriate. I added output, to the appropriate codes, that helps you check the spacing for any given design. For the eight built in examples, you will see that some examples meet the criteria at every station, while others only meet the criteria at some stations, and others don't meet the criteria at any station. The closer the airfoils are the more PROP_DESIGN will over predict performance. PROP_DESIGN assumes that all of the airfoils act independently of each other. This is a simplification made by traditional propeller design methods, which PROP_DESIGN stems from and improves upon.
Below are some pictures that show what the airfoil interaction effect looks like. Analysis details; NACA 65A009 airfoil, 2 degree angle of attack, Mach .75 airspeed, 7.02e6 Reynolds number (see note below), and two chord lengths of spacing. The geometry layout is all that can be achieved with this particular program. It is not representative of a propeller layout. Nevertheless, the pictures do a good job of showing the airfoil interaction effect. The complete study is located in the PROP_DESIGN documentation folder.
Note:
As mentioned above, the pictures below are for Re = 7.02e6. This was the average of all PROP_DESIGN examples, at the time I did this study. That number has since changed to 4.1e6. The average Reynolds number, for the airfoil wind tunnel test data, is 3.5e6.
You can do it, too! Sign up for free now at https://www.jimdo.com